tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7296606518210633585.post5103648814028204287..comments2024-02-06T22:19:13.028-08:00Comments on Mining Aśvaghoṣa's Gold: BUDDHACARITA 1.62: The King's Attachment Begets Fear & CoweringMike Crosshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12712396374023835678noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7296606518210633585.post-42204795244984071062012-07-01T05:09:03.881-07:002012-07-01T05:09:03.881-07:00Thanks Malcolm.
Israeli "settlers," and...Thanks Malcolm.<br /><br />Israeli "settlers," and Islaamic fundamentalists who feel justified in flogging those fellow residents of Timbuktu who like a drink, are a couple of examples that spring to mind. <br /><br />All the best,<br /><br />MikeMike Crosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12712396374023835678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7296606518210633585.post-34143896081239298722012-07-01T04:13:12.687-07:002012-07-01T04:13:12.687-07:00Hi Mike,
I could procrastinate for England (if th...Hi Mike,<br /><br />I could procrastinate for England (if they let me)...<br /><br />In verse 1.46 you read <i>tāni tāni, kṛtāni</i> and <i>akṛtāni</i> as neuter plural accusatives - similarly <i>khyātāni</i> and <i>karmāṇi</i> in 1.45. I read them as neuter plural nominatives. Who's right?<br /><br />And a misprint in verse 1.52 which I guess you noticed but just copied: <i>ivantidevaḥ</i> - should be ivāntidevaḥ<br /><br />My apologies for not mentioning these inconsequentials at the time. <br /><br />That’s a load off!<br /><br />MalcolmMalcolm Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07695792204679760604noreply@blogger.com